Passer les menus de navigation
Logo Acorn

2030 or 2050: when will we really be ready to take action for the planet?

Why do some environmental goals motivate us to act more than others? A new study, in which Tunyaporn Vichiengior, a lecturer at Rennes School of Business, took part, examines the influence of time on our commitment to sustainability.

The closer it is, the more concerned we feel?

Published in the Journal of Travel Research, the study The Temporal Paradox of Sustainability: How Goal Time Frames, Immediacy, and Contextual Cues Motivate Tourist Engagement analyses how the timeframes of environmental goals influence tourists’ commitment.

The researchers highlight a paradox: environmental issues require long-term thinking, but we are generally more responsive to goals whose outcomes seem imminent. A commitment set for 2030 may therefore seem more tangible and urgent than a target set for 2050.

But this does not mean we should abandon long-term goals. The study shows that they can become more compelling when accompanied by concrete examples, such as progress already made or local-level impacts.

View Dr Tunyaporn VICHIENGIOR’s profile

Better communication to encourage action

These findings offer practical insights for stakeholders in the tourism sector on how to communicate their environmental commitments more effectively. Rather than simply announcing an ambition for 2050, demonstrating what is already being done today can help the public better understand the impact of these commitments.

More broadly, this research provides a better understanding of how communication around sustainability can influence consumer behaviour, an issue that is also relevant to marketing and branding.

This publication helps to highlight the research carried out at Rennes School of Business on environmental issues and consumer behaviour.

Read the full article

Find out more about research at RSB